summary: a repeat view review

ok just for any of you who haven't been following along for the past year or six months or so...this is what i'm doing. i am putting together a book, and if you read this BLOG you will read the chapters before they go to print. the book will compare arminianism and calvinism and all the effin problems that arminianism has.

scripture
sovereignty
sin
love
election
regeneration
justification
sanctification
perseverance

so many damn problems. i thought at least we could agree on sanctification and then i read wesley. or at least we can agree on justification and then i read wesley.

NO YOU CAN AND SHOULD BE PERFECT IF YOU WANT TO BE REDEEMED FOREVER

NO YOU DO NOT RECEIVE CHRIST'S RIGHTEOUSNESS YOU MUST BE RIGHTEOUS YOURSELF

i guess wesley, finney, et al, believed they were all perfect men.

arminians do not trust scripture. they have a superior plan of salvation to scripture. no, God is too partial, too cruel, so we believe that he should love everyone and damn no one unless they really want to be damned because otherwise if God chooses for all he's bad because we don't understand scripture we have to rewrite it to fit our limited, ignorant, arrogant comprehension. no, sin isn't that bad. it doesn't completely destroy the soul and make man unable to trust, love, follow, or serve God. sin isn't sin. no, God doesn't elect sinners. he elects righteous people. regeneration is something everyone has from birth. everyone receives Christ's justification and this is regeneration but everyone is also condemned because sin. sanctification is perfection. now in this life and you can do it because you have the "good power of free will" (NORMAN GEISLER). no, you have free will and you must be perfect but you will lose your salvation if you are not perfect because f*ck you. God only loves you as much as you can prove how righteous you are.

i hate this garbage theology. wesley ruined so much of the western church, and by the extension of missionary work, much of the Church. the synod of dort condemned arminianism for a reason, but every calvinist after edwards except maybe macarthur just let it slide. fckin hell.

sorry i'm just mad