Chapter 1. Rough draft

 1. You are here

The enlightenment, democracy, feminism, multiculturalism, tolerance, freedom, jew love, Darwinism, secularism, evolution, naturalism, post-war consensus

Democracy, feminism, multiculturalism/PWC, Darwinism/atheism

2. Law/leadership

3. Scripture on democracy

4. Eschatology

5. History

6. The great commission

7. Colonialism

8. Inheriting the land

9. Victory/conquest

 

Introduction

As a man thinketh…

I believe in ideas. Of course, I believe in ideas, but in this case, I believe that ideas form us, as individuals and as a society. Ideas make us who we are and the ideas we believe constitute the most important part of us. Our ideas, our beliefs, our concept of reality, of God, honestly, make us wise or foolish, moral or immoral, kind or cruel, strong or weak, faithful or vile, satanic, maniacs.

We receive ideas from different sources, from philosophy and academics, from our leaders, from the religions we create. We create ideas as we interpret our history, and we receive them as we learn from Creation and the Word of God. Not all of these sources give us the truth, however. Not all of these sources give us the ideas we need to create a stable, strong, prosperous, or benevolent society.

For generations, we have believed that all men are created equal, all bear the imago Dei, and all deserve equal rights, protection, and treatment under the law. We champion equality in our news media, entertainment, advertisements, our churches, academic institutions, etc. etc. If God has created all men equally, then every belief that men have is also equal. Nothing is invalid, and therefore, nothing is evil. This equality doctrine gives us democracy and civil rights. Democracy gave us women’s suffrage which gave us feminism which gave us abortion. Civil rights gave us integration which gave us a population which comprises 13% of the total but commits 50% of the crime. Civil rights also gave us gay rights which gave us gay “marriage”, pride parades, drag queen story hour, transgender surgery for minors, and AIDS. Equality gave us the tragic story of David Reimer.

David Reimer

Ron and Janet Reimer gave birth to identical twins Bruce and Brian Reimer in August of 1965. Sometime after the twins reached the age of seven months, they contracted phimosis, a common dysfunction where the foreskin becomes temporarily sealed at the tip and prevents proper urination. Their pediatrician recommended circumcision and Ron and Janet scheduled an appointment at their local hospital.

With the usual attending physician unavailable, the circumcision of the twins fell to general practitioner Dr. Jean-Marie Huot. Typically, the physician will stretch the foreskin of the infant over a bell-shaped metal shell for removal with a scalpel. Dr. Huot, however, decided to use a cauterizing machine to severe the foreskin. The instrument sends a current through a needle-like cutting tool that cauterizes the wound as the doctor makes the incision,

a dangerous consideration, since it would bring perilously close to the penis a current that could be conducted by the metal bell encasing the organ. If, at the same time, the current to the needle were to be turned up almost to the maximum, the results could be cataclysmic.

Dr. Huot set the machine to minimum power and touched it to the infant’s foreskin, which failed. Increasing the setting, the second attempt also failed. Increasing once more, the doctor touched the instrument to the foreskin.

“I heard a sound,” recalls Dr. Max Cham, the anesthesiologist, “just like steak being seared.” A wisp of smoke curled up from the baby’s groin. An aroma as of cooking meat filled the air.

Dr. Huot had incinerated the infant’s penis.

Though a freakish historic blizzard had just hit Winnipeg, the hospital called Ron and Janet and summoned them. They visited their son and Janet asked the doctor, “Will it still grow, and he’ll just have a little penis?” The doctor said, “No. That’s not how it works.” The burnt penis eventually dried up and broke away, till nothing remained. Barely out of their teen years, the couple desperately turned for help to charismatic gender specialist, Dr. John Money.

Dr. Money, a specialist from Johns Hopkins University, had experience in the treatment of children with ambiguous genitalia, and he told the Reimers that he and his team could successfully transition the boy into a girl. Money gleefully accepted their case, as it provided him with a control (the boys were identical twins) in a fantastic scientific experiment. Money’s confident and professional manor made the Reimers believe they and their son were in the best possible hands. Janet said, “I looked up to him like a god. I believed whatever he said,” and Money said exactly what the desperate couple longed to hear. He promised them that he could give their son a perfectly functional vagina, “adequate for sexual intercourse and for sexual pleasure,” though obviously he would remain unable to bear children. He also promised that he would develop psychologically as a woman and eventually find himself attracted to men. At first hesitant, the couple inevitably gave in to what they perceived as the best chance for Bruce—who later took the name David—to enjoy a somewhat fulfilling life, but almost immediately, the child fought the feminine socialization process.

After the twins’ second birthday, Janet first put David into a dress she had sewn herself with material from her wedding gown. “It was pretty and lacy,” Janet recalls. “She was ripping at it, trying to tear it off. I remember thinking, Oh my God, she knows she’s a boy and she doesn’t want girls’ clothing. She doesn’t want to be a girl.” Similar scenes repeated themselves all throughout the twins’ childhood. Brian describes his memories:

When I say there was nothing feminine about Brenda, I mean there was nothing feminine. She walked like a guy. Sat with her legs apart. She talked about guy things, didn’t give a crap about cleaning house, getting married, wearing makeup. She’d get a skipping rope for a gift, and the only thing we’d use that for was to tie people up, whip people with it. She played with my toys: Tinkertoys, dump trucks. This toy sewing machine she got just sat.

Among the more benign details of the process, Money’s team instructed David (given the name “Brenda”) to draw which gender he imagined himself to be. At six years old, having endured a number of years’ worth of feminine socialization, David drew a boy. Even after a considerable amount of coaxing, when asked what the opposite gender to himself would wear, David said, “A dress.” David eventually caved to the pressure to answer the questions and participate in these activities as they desired, as a girl would. In an interview that David had many years later, he said,

“It was like brainwashing,” he was saying as he lit the first in an unbroken chain of cigarettes. “I’d give just about anything to go to a hypnotist to black out my whole past. Because it’s torture. What they did to you in the body is sometimes not near as bad as what they did to you in the mind—with the psychological warfare in your head.”

Money introduced pornographic materials and sexual mimicry to the young twins in an attempt to develop David’s gender identity.

“He would show us pictures of kids—boys and girls—with no clothes on,” Brian says. David recalls that Dr. Money also showed them pictures of adults engaged in sexual intercourse. “He’d say to us, ‘I want to show you pictures of things that moms and dads do.’”

This left deep and lasting scars on the boys, especially David.

After years of this “therapy,” which found David both desperately trying to please his family by trying to be a girl, and stubbornly fighting against this insanity with all his natural instinct, David’s parents took him to a different therapist. The year was 1980, and David had reached a breaking point, and his parents felt the same. David, as Brenda, often fought with his mother who saw his failure to adjust to his assigned gender identity as her own failure.

“She told me to clean up the fridge,” David says. “I used as much elbow grease as possible, but it wasn’t to her liking. I shouted, ‘I’m doing the best I can!’ She threw a box of cereal at my face. I threw it back at her. She was ready to hit me. I grabbed her hand and shoved her.

A member of the therapy team, when David had decided he had enough of being a girl and refused to go along with any of the examinations or the treatments, asked him, “Do you want to be a girl or not?” David bellowed in his face, “NO!” The doctors then told Ron and Janet Reimer that it was time to tell David the truth about what happened to him.

Ron took his son to get an ice cream cone and David knew his father had something serious to tell him. “Is mother dying? Are you guys getting a divorce? Is everything OK with Brian?”

“No, no,” Ron said to him. “Everything’s fine.”

“He just started explaining, step by step, everything that happened to me,” Brenda says. “He told me that I was born a boy, and about the accident when they were trying to circumcise me, and how they saw all kinds of specialists, and they took the best advice they had at the time, which was to try to change me over. My dad got very upset.” It was the first time Brenda every saw her father cry.

David had one question for his father.

It concerned that brief charmed span of eight months directly after her birth, the only period of her life when she ever had been, or ever would be fully intact. “What,” she asked, “was my name?”

The Problem

I hate this world. I hate what this society has created and I hate what this church has allowed. I hate the things this society believes, that men are women and women are men, that children can choose which sex to be but cannot choose (yet) to have sex, that all the races are equal in grace, intelligence, strength, and creativity, that every feces-worshipping and child-molesting pagan is born of the same image as every faithful believer in Christ. The story of David Reimer illustrates the insanity of the equality doctrine—men and women are not only equal in dignity and value, in the capacity to trust in Christ, in their worth to society, and they do not only deserve equal rights to work and to vote, but they are functionally identical except for some “minor” genital differences, and can be transformed from one sex to the other at will.

When Christ claimed authority over heaven and earth, he also delegated this authority to his disciples, his church. He also tells us that we are the salt and light of the earth. We are the salt, to preserve the world from the death, corruption, the filth and perversion of sin. We are the light to guide the world into truth and righteousness, but what do our pastors tell us? This world is not our home. Christ has given us the authority and power to lead, guide, and preserve this world, but what do we do? We give up before we even begin. We gather on Sunday and shelter ourselves and speak kindly to each other. We worship our Lord but we refuse to obey his command. We believe that if we just live right, if we love each other, if we love and accept the pagan, the sodomite, adulterer, murderer, and the blasphemer that he will bend the knee to Christ. Why would he? What is there for him to fear? We do not rule. We do not preserve. We do not guide. We do not disciple the nations as Christ commanded us.

We have two problems in this world of ours. One, we believe wicked lies. We think we have created this wonderful thing, equality, and that this new belief makes us “enlightened,” superior to our ancestors, wiser and more compassionate. We believe that our wisdom and compassion exceed that of the God who created us. “We aren’t racists,” we tell ourselves. “We don’t discriminate against race, creed, or gender,” and this makes us kind, noble, and good. Meanwhile, the pagans flood into our country, torture and molest our daughters, the godless women vote to slaughter uncountable numbers of unborn, the sodomites parade their perversion in the streets for our children to witness, and the negroes do what they love best: crime. But God, however, has never commanded us to treat all equally. He has created order, and if we abandon his order, if we say it does not exist, we disobey God and we blaspheme his creation.

In the same way, we find order among men. For those who excel in intelligence, are naturally rulers; whereas those who are less intelligent, but strong in body, seem made by nature for service, as Aristotle says in his Politics. The statement of Solomon (Prov. 11.29) is in agreement with this: The fool shall serve the wise.

God does not give equal grace to individuals to save them, to make them strong, or intelligent, or wise, and neither does he give equal grace to the races. Just as God loves and hates individuals, and determines their destiny from all eternity, so he loves and hates nations, and blesses or curses them from their inception. God is a God of order, and not chaos, but if we ignore this, if we seek to dismantle it, we destroy the nations, we destroy ourselves, our children, and all of Creation. God has created truth, goodness, and beauty all to sit atop the created hierarchy: some are inferior, some are superior.

Two, this church of ours, namely our leadership of recent generations, refuses to take up the authority granted by Christ. Our leadership will speak all the words that agree with the spirit of the age—equality, democracy, freedom, liberty—but deny all that scripture tells us—hierarchy, order, difference, grace, and curse. Our leaders will be all that women should be—kind, humble, gentle, patient—but refuse to do what God commands men to do—rule, lead, administer justice, conquer nations, or punish the wicked. Our leaders are not men and God commands men to lead, not women. They tell us that “This world is not our home,” and “Christ’s kingdom is not of this world,” two mantras which make men passive, submissive, and callous. Yes, this world is not our eternal home, but it is our home now, and Christ has commanded us to lead and preserve it, not only for his glory, but for the benefit of our children and grandchildren, to a thousand generations, and not only for the benefit of our posterity, but for the benefit of the unbelieving pagan, to cause him to fear God, to hear the Gospel whether he wants to or not, and for God to use the means of a Christian nation to redeem his soul. Yes, the Kingdom of Christ is not of this world, as to originate from it, but Christ has claimed this world as his Kingdom, to become his. He commands us to disciple this world, not to give the nations a democratic choice, but to subdue them in his name. God has not given us these notions of freedom or democracy or liberty. We are not free people; we are slaves of Christ. The pagan is not free; he is a slave to sin. As heirs of Christ, we are to set him free from sin and enslave him to Christ. Puritan minister Matthew Henry tells us what the Great Commission commands:

Christ, the Mediator, is setting up a kingdom in the world, bringing the nations to be his subjects; setting up a school, bringing the nations to be his scholars; raising an army for the carrying on of the war against the powers of darkness, enlist the nations of the earth under his banner. The work which the apostles had to do, was to set up the Christian religion in all places, and it was honourable work; the achievements of the mighty heroes of the world were nothing to it. They conquered the nations for themselves, and made them miserable; the apostles conquered them for Christ, and made them happy.

The Solution

In 1956, Jim Elliot, along with four of his friends, fellow missionaries, met their deaths at the hands of Auca natives in the jungles of Ecuador. Elliot and company believed that God commanded them to sacrifice their lives for the sake of spreading the Gospel, a message of hope and peace, of the love of God for all mankind, but ultimately just that—a message. The Great Commission, however, is not a message, it is not a sermon, it is not love for all, but a command to conquer. Christ does not proclaim his love for all men, but he instead commands them to submit to his kingdom and to bend the knee to his throne: “Repent, for the Kingdom of heaven is at hand” (Matthew 4.17). He commands the nations to submit and he commands his church to subdue. We see this as far back as the first chapter of Genesis.

In the jungles of Ecuador, Elliot committed another great blasphemy. Not only did he fail to conquer the nation for Christ, but in dying, he declared his love for the Aucan pagans above his love for his own family. He abandoned his wife Elisabeth and his daughter Valerie because he believed the life of the unbelieving pagan more valuable to him than his own kin.

God has given us land to conquer, nations to rule, and children to disciple, to raise, and to teach the name of Christ to. We are men and we are not women. God gives strength and will to men to fight, to lead, to defend, to conquer, to destroy the wicked, and to rule. If we do not do these things, we defy God and we blaspheme his creation, for we are his creation and we do not fulfill the purpose he has created for us. If men do not fulfill their purpose, they declare that God is a fool and they know better than him what he created them for.

What is the solution, exactly? Christians rule Christian nations through application of biblical law in every corner of the earth. There is no equality, no feminism, no multiculturalism, no tolerance and no democracy. All pagan religions abolished. All subhuman races brutally suppressed if not utterly eliminated. You will submit to Christ or face the sword. This is the will of God.

From His mouth comes a sharp sword, so that with it He may strike down the nations, and He will rule them with a rod of iron; and He treads the wine press of the fierce wrath of God, the Almighty.