Friday, May 15, 2020

Thursday

Buddy turned 20 yesterday and I totally forgot until I saw someone maybe Jayme post something but I don't know how I remembered. we bought some pizza from california pizza chicken. She's Jayme Coyle now by the way. Not sure how I feel about that but I'm happy for her. She gets what she wants—a normal happy life. That's great. I never wanted that. I only ever wanted an epic soul strengthening God glorifying one in a billion masterpiece of a life. like Jim Elliot or John Calvin or John Wycliffe. burn me at this goddamned stake--nothing less! Only God can do this and it's not gonna happen in a few years. Will it even happen at all? IDK. Maybe.

I was reading Jonathan Edwards yesterday (sermon: HOPE AND COMFORT USUALLY FOLLOW GENUINE HUMILIATION AND REPENTANCE) and he was describing my exact situation. Years ago I read a verse in Hosea that I totally identified with.

I will give her her vineyards from there and the valley of Achor for a door of hope; and she shall sing there as in the days of her youth and as in the day when she came up out of the land of Egypt

It was me. I had failed like Achan in Joshua 7(?). They named the valley after him after they executed him and his entire family and burned all his possessions when he disobeyed the Lord. I deserved this as well. But God here promises to redeem the failure of Achan. I feel for Achan and Saul. I have the same failures—lust, fear, disobedience—if God condemns them then he condemns me. i sin so much. every day, so many times. how can i be God's? how can his Spirit dwell within me?

he would first bring her into the wilderness; he would bring her into trouble and distress, and so humble her, and then allure her by speaking comfortingly to her

God humbled Israel, the proud nation, the Chosen Ones of the Lord. before she had this hope and comfort give, she should be brought into great trouble and distress to humble her. God brought her into the wilderness to humble her and fit her to receive vineyards and to make her see her dependence on God for them, that she might not attribute the blessing to idols as she had done before. no one i knew was more vain, more self-centered, more proud than me. i was a shy kid but i thought i was amazing. i went to harvard don't you know? I'm still proud even after all of my failures. i still think i'm smarter than everyone else, that i don't need to follow the rules because i know better, i'm more intelligent, I WENT TO HARVARD I EARNED A MATH DEGREE WHO OF YOU WENT TO HARVARD NONE OF YOU THAT'S GODDAMN RIGHT

that's how i feel and no one can convince me otherwise. except God can and he has and he is. Edwards says God brings us trouble because of our sin. in my case, my sin brings me trouble. it's the same thing. 

sometimes they fear that they have but a short time to live, and that God will soon cast them to hell; that none ever were as they are, who ever found mercy; that their case is peculiar, and that all wherein they differ from others is for the worse. in the issue of all they are afraid they shall perish forever. they are afraid that when they die they shall go down to hell, and there have their portion appointed them in everlasting burnings. this is the sum of all their fears. the end of this trouble in those whom God designs mercy is to humble them.

i am the worst addict i have ever known and i used to attend those SAA meetings. the only guy maybe worse than me died of an OD about twenty years ago. so i win because he's dead.

i don't know what God is doing. sometimes I don't even know if he is doing anything. how can i know this? i can only know by faith. that's all we have. he doesn't speak audibly to us. he doesn't present himself before us in physical form. he will never make it that easy. he will never destroy faith by giving sight, not until we pass on, anyway. don't you charismatics understand? he doesn't want you to be that shallow. he gives us trouble for our good, for our strength, for us to know who we are and who he is. He keeps us at a distance because he loves us, because he knows this causes us to seek him, to be desperate for him, to humble ourselves before him and beg for his presence. your pastor can't give you a "word from the Lord" because God wants you to seek him yourself and it will rarely be an wonderful ecstatic emotional experience. most of the time you will be on your knees, begging God to show himself and show you belong to him after you've failed him again and again and again... you need to know how weak and sad and pathetic you are before you can begin to know how wonderful and powerful he is. until then, you're just glorifying yourself.

Sunday, May 10, 2020

instagram discussion

i know these are rarely productive but this one wasn't a complete clusterfunk. they went out from us












Saturday, May 9, 2020

conclusion

here is the last chapter. there's also a chapter on a few objections i thought were important but didn't answer throughout the book. maybe i'll post that later


Despite the grand separation that the Reformers initiated which created the Protestant church, many believers today content themselves to return to the errors that necessitated the Reformation. These errors presently manifest themselves within the Church in a myriad of ways, including but not limited to, the charismatic, feminist, and homosexual movements. If the Church only had to contend with these kinds of blatantly obvious large-scale movements, we would have little problem exposing these errors, but we must also contend with more subtle errors that involve practices of worship, emphases of teaching, valuing experience over scripture, and men who enter and leave the faith merely to gain attention for themselves. We find that this onslaught of errors begins with a single, profoundly obvious error, and that is the denial of the sovereignty of God. Most believers, Arminian and Calvinist, affirm God’s sovereignty, but in fact all do not. If men affirm freedom, they must deny sovereignty. 


If men possess this freedom of will, then God either must lay aside his sovereignty in deference to it, or he must never have been sovereign in the first place. He either chooses to not exercise sovereignty, or he is not omniscient or omnipotent or both. If man is to be free, then God cannot know his choices before he makes them, for that would lock his choices into the Divine Mind and no other choice would be possible. If man is to be free, then God cannot change nor ordain his choices nor can he change the consequences that the free man desires. God cannot be omniscient nor omnipotent in a world where man is free. 


Men who believe they are free from the dictates of God and from his ultimate authority and control of their lives also believe they are free from the authority of his word. The Catholic Church has long upheld free will and they also have long maintained the authority of human tradition along with that of scripture. In fact, the Catholic Church gives precedence to man-made tradition over scripture. Arminian churches do the same today, resulting in the many previously mentioned errors. 


The Church must uphold scripture as the only rule and standard by which we know and serve God. If we ignore, dismantle, or belittle any part of it, we do the same to God. If we tear down the foundation of our faith, either by neglect or outright blasphemy, we tear down everything that we have built upon it. We must trust the Scripture that declares God sovereignly reigns over every part of our lives even though we do not understand it and we do not enjoy it. We must admit that we are proud, sinful, self-centered creatures that still harbor a measure of rebellion against the God who has saved us. 


Free will sounds like solid theology. It leads to responsibility, and responsibility leads to morality, and that is the goal, right? God wants moral people. False. That is not God’s goal. Free will may logically lead to moral responsibility, but it does so at the expense of the sovereignty of God. Free will necessarily denies God’s sovereignty, and when I say necessarily, I mean to say that we can arrive at no other conclusion, biblically, logically, or truthfully. This is why the consistent Arminians explicitly tell us that God is not sovereign, because he chooses not to be. 


If men have a free will, then God is not sovereign, as sovereignty requires sovereignty over the will of men. 


The two are incompatible. Arminian theology, with free will at the core, denies the deity of God. God reigns sovereignly and this is a necessary attribute of his deity. He is not God without it. If you say, He chooses to not be sovereign, then you are saying, He chooses to cease being God. You speak nonsense.  


The only way God can possibly choose to allow men their free will, to step back and not control, guide, intend every thought, deed, or word of men, is if he believed that they are wiser, more loving, and more powerful than him. If God allows men their free will, he must believe that they can order the universe better, with more blessed outcomes, with more souls saved, with more glory to him, than if he ordered the universe himself. The other option is that God allows men their free will because he knows they cannot order an improved universe, guarantee more salvations, or greater honor to himself, and he allows this because he hates men and despises his own gloryThis is the arrogance of Arminianism.  


God does not seek moral people, or even primarily holy people. God desires, above and before all else, to glorify his name. Only this paradigm fits everything in scripture. How else can we explain the death of Christ? How else can we explain that God ordained, allowed, and desired the most immoral act in all of history? God not only ordains but directly causes horrible things that destroy entire nations—Egypt, Assyria, even Israel exemplify this. If God seeks primarily to bless humanity, how can we make any sense of this? He allows men to perish in their sin, refusing them the grace of repentance, not opening their eyes to his truth (Deuteronomy 2.30; Joshua 11.20; 1 Samuel 2.25; Matthew 11.25; John 9.39; Romans 11.7-8). Scripture clearly teaches this. How can anyone attest to the primacy of Scripture and still believe he loves all men and primarily seeks to save them? 


It is evident, by both Scripture and reason, that God is infinitely, eternally, unchangeably, and independently glorious and happy; that he cannot be profited by, or receive anything from, the creature; or be the subject of any sufferings, or diminution of his glory and felicity, from any other being.441 


God does not seek above all the happiness of men but instead his own glorification. Men exist for his pleasure and not he for ours. 


For this reason I have allowed you to remain, in order to show you My power and in order to proclaim My name through all the earth. 

But at the end of that period, I, Nebuchadnezzar, raised my eyes toward heaven and my reason returned to me, and I blessed the Most High and praised and honored Him who lives forever. 

For the sake of My name I delay My wrath, and for My praise I restrain it for you, in order not to cut you off. Behold, I have refined you, but not as silver; I have tested you in the furnace of affliction. For My own sake, for My own sake, I will act; for how can My name be profaned? And My glory I will not give to another. 

What if God, although willing to demonstrate His wrath and to make His power known, endured with much patience vessels of wrath prepared for destruction? And He did so to make known the riches of His glory upon vessels of mercy, which He prepared beforehand for glory.442 


God sets himself highest in his affections because he deserves the highest place of all affections of himself and all created beings. 


[God] has respect to himself, as his last and highest end, in this work [of Creation]; because he is worthy in himself to be so, being infinitely the greatest and best of all beings. All things else, with regard to worthiness, importance, and excellence, are perfectly as nothing in comparison to him. And therefore, if God has any respect to things according to their nature and proportions, he must necessarily have the greatest respect to himself.443 


We rightly give God worship, honor, praise, devotion, and glory and this is righteousness. God glorifies himself as his ultimate goal in Creation, in the life of every person in existence, some to salvation and the rest to damnation. 

next thing

i guess this book isn't going to change my life, make me famous, wealthy or attractive to women... oh well. the teaching opportunities have dried up. not sure what to do with my life. i'm an old man and i feel lost. i guess i'll make youtube videos

i'm currently reading Lorraine Boettner's Roman Catholicism and it's very interesting. i think i'll begin talking about this book. i also want to cover John Stott's The Cross of Christ since it's supposed to be a classic and i didn't really read it well when i covered it in my soteriology class.

i always go back to this one night sometime in 1990-something. i was in high school or just beginning college and attending Valley Bible Fellowship here in bakersfield. PRON was holding some kind of prayer meeting and i asked for prayer. i didn't ask for anything. i just wanted to give my life to Jesus -- "Whatever you want" -- i don't even think i was really saved at that time. i wanted my life to be God's like Jesus said
unless a man take up his cross and follow me, he cannot be my disciple
nothing seemed to change. i went to school. i got married. i struggled with porn. i had kids. i continued to struggle with porn. i got a teaching credential. i struggled. i lost my credential. i struggled at work. i got an engineering job. i lost my engineering job. i left my wife. i wanted to kill myself. i wept for probably accumulated years. i still struggle. i can say that i make slow progress. it's like i'm half alive in a desert wringing whatever moisture i can out of whatever dry cactus i can find and every day i get just a hair stronger than yesterday ... i'm literally nothing in this world and i've watched everyone pass me by in every possible way: success, relationships, mental health...the only thing i can point to and say "yeah i had a part in that and it's very amazing" is my children. i love them and i love that they're mine but i've done all i can to raise them influence them teach them. if my life has no other purpose, i might as well die.

the only hope i can possibly imagine the only purpose i can think of is something alan redpath and charles spurgeon said
when God wants to do an impossible task, he takes an impossible man and crushes him

when God means to make a man great, he always breaks him into pieces first
if this be not true if God has no plan in my unending failure if God does not exist if God is not mine--i have absolutely nothing. no hope no strength no future no life no purpose no sanity ...

i used to think i had such impossibly great faith. i wasn't even saved at the time. i know now that i have the least faith. i have the worst character. i have the most fear and the least trust in God. lots of knowledge. little maturity. some days i can't imagine any way i can belong to God and i get afraid i will burn in hell for eternity. 

where am i going with this? i don't know. maybe God actually has a plan for me but whatever i'm just glad no one reads this blog.

Thursday, May 7, 2020

i can do nothing

i started discussing eternal security with someone on instagram who had some questions. i answered all her questions and she was done. then some kid chimed in, ignoring everything i said and said

yeah God keeps us but he really doesn't

what the heck. this guy looks like he's 14. i mean seriously how full of yourself do you have to be to argue about soteriology at that age?

which view fits more exegetically?

the two are not antithetical but rather work together for the glory of God

lololol he's got the big words down. if only he knew what they meant.

i get so enraged. just completely nuts. i didn't chew him out. i just explained things to him, asked him how God keeps us but also doesn't keep us...i don't know if i go nuts because some kid disagreed with me or because he's just talking complete gibberish and people are agreeing with him. 

i can't do anything to convince anyone.

Saturday, May 2, 2020

losing your religion


Perseverance

If God elects us, then only he can un-elect us. If he has completely justified us, then we remain forever justified. If he sanctifies us by his Spirit, then our sanctification is guaranteed. However, if our salvation depends on us in any measure, then we are lost. If God has not chosen us individually, then why would he mind if any individual perished eternally? If our justification depends on our righteousness, then how sure can we be that we will live with Christ in eternity?

Does God guarantee our salvation? Or does he require us to stand in faith in order to abide with him in eternity? Yes, to both. Most Arminians believe that a Christian, once genuinely saved, justified, regenerated, and sanctified (whether entirely or not), can lose his salvation and perish in hell forever. This believer has no idea about the exact amount of sin that ends his relationship, though Wesley believes that the slightest doubt will do it, and Walls and Dongell seem to confirm this.[1] God did not elect this believer individually, he did not give him faith—other than some amount of external influence that he gives to everyone—and he does not guarantee his justification any more than what the believer can maintain for himself.

Thankfully, scripture does not teach that we can lose our salvation. Scripture often warns against falling away, but it also teaches that God keeps us. We are his children, after all.

Grieving the Holy Spirit

Paul tells the church at Ephesus not to grieve the Holy Spirit (Ephesians 4.30), but what exactly does he mean? Wesley interpreted this to mean to offend God so deeply that he abandons us. He says that there is nothing more important “than to consider with what temper of soul we are to entertain his divine presence, so as not either to drive him from us, or to disappoint him of the gracious ends for which his abode with us is designed.”[2] Wesley mentions two results here—in one we completely forfeit our salvation and drive away the Spirit, and in the other we merely “disappoint” him, yet he fails to distinguish the causes of either or to otherwise separate the two effects, leading readers to conclude that he intends them to be interpreted as a single, identical result. By “grieve,” Paul means that God hates sin. This is nothing new, but does this mean that Paul also means that God abandons us at any sin, or does Paul mean that God abandons us only when we commit certain sins?

In the chapter in question, Paul lists numerous sins, but he does not tell Ephesus that these sins “provoke God to withdraw from [them],” as Wesley contends.[3] Paul tells them to “walk no longer just as the Gentiles also walk” (4.17). He encourages them to “lay aside the old self, be renewed in the spirit of your mind, and put on the new self” (4.23-24). He contrasts their new life in Christ with the life of the unbelievers. They have hard hearts (4.18), have given themselves to sensuality (4.19), but the believer lives his life in a completely different way. “You did not learn Christ in this way,” he tells them (4.20). He tells Ephesus to speak truth, control their anger and their tongue, put away bitterness, wrath, anger, clamor, slander, and malice, and to be kind and forgiving (4.25-32). Nowhere does he tell them that God will abandon them if they do not do these things. Certainly, our sin grieves the Holy Spirit, even after he has redeemed us, but does God leave us when we sin?

While in other sermons, Wesley plainly says that Christians do not sin,[4] here he says that the believer can frustrate the work of the Holy Spirit so that as he “pours out the riches of his grace upon us, he finds them all unsuccessful.”[5] Wesley again contradicts himself. Regardless, he believes that the Spirit pours out his grace on the Christian to no avail. “By all the wise methods of his grace, he cannot reform” some of us, and therefore we “provoke him to withdraw from us.”[6] The Holy Spirit finds that his work in our hearts has proved unfruitful, and so he leaves us. We are too evil for him, our hearts too sinful, even though we are no more sinful—we should be less—than when he redeemed us, and our sin has overcome his grace. Wesley compares the Spirit to a man who
Will forgive his friend a great many imprudences, and some willful transgressions, but to find him frequently affronting him, all his kindness will wear off by degrees, and the warmth of his affection will die away.[7]

In all of this, Wesley uses not a single scripture to support his claim that the Spirit abandons us when we sin. Nothing supports Wesley’s beliefs but his assumptions about the nature of God and his analogy that compares the infinite grace of the Holy Spirit to the finite patience of a man. Wesley uses one scripture from Isaiah 5, the parable of the vineyard, but the parable does not say that God casts off or destroys Israel, but instead speaks of judgment for her sins. In Jeremiah, even after God judges Israel, he says to them
Is Ephraim my dear son?
Is he a delightful child?
Indeed, as often as I have spoken against him,
I certainly still remember him.[8]
Jeremiah adds
Thus says the Lord,
Who gives the sun for light by day
And the fixed order of the moon and the stars for light by night,
Who stirs up the sea so that its waves roar;
The Lord of hosts is His name:
“If this fixed order departs
From before Me,” declares the Lord,
“Then the offspring of Israel also will cease
From being a nation before Me forever.”
“If the heavens above can be measured
And the foundations of the earth searched out below,
Then I will also cast off all the offspring of Israel
For all that they have done,” declares the Lord.[9]

Wesley condemns the believer at the slightest doubt.
If it be said, “But sometimes a believer in Christ may lose his sight of the mercy of God.” … I answer, supposing him not to see the mercy of God, then he is not a believer. Therefore, as any one loses his light, he, for the time, loses his faith. A true believer in Christ may lose the light of faith. He may, for a time, fall again into condemnation.[10]
The Arminian god does not suffer a single doubt. He does not suffer even the slightest tinge of carelessness from his children before casting them away.
The first I shall mention, as being more especially grievous to the Holy Spirit, is inconsiderateness and inadvertence to his holy motions within us. There is a particular frame and temper of soul, a sobriety of mind, without which the Spirit of God will not concur in the purifying of our hearts. … This consists in preserving our minds in a cool and serious disposition, in regulating and calming our affections, and calling in and checking the inordinate pursuits of our passions after the vanities and pleasures of this world.[11]
I am amazed that Wesley can so fervently declare the “holy love” of God, yet also claim that we lose our salvation as soon as the cares of the world distract us from God in the slightest. Of course we will doubt from time to time and lose sight of our great Redeemer and his work for us. We are human. We live in a world corrupted by sin and we carry about a nature corrupted by sin. To say, as Finney did, that our standing before God requires “present, full, and entire consecration of heart and life to God for His service”[12] is to say that without a doubt at some point every single one of us will lose our salvation.

But Finney and Wesley are correct. If it is possible to lose our salvation, every sin condemns us. Every sin separates us from God’s love. If God does not consider Christ’s righteousness as belonging to us, then every doubt, every selfish thought, every moment where we do not devote every bit of ourselves to him will undoubtedly reaffirm our eternal death sentence and forfeit the blood Christ shed for us.

Arminians like to champion their religion as the true message of God’s love, but their message does not actually begin with God’s love but with their will. Men elect themselves; men love God rather than receive his love, and men keep themselves in right standing before God. These notions follow logically from each other and only the logically inconsistent Arminian (a “Calminian”) believes that men choose God, but then God keeps men in contradiction to their sinful choices and against their will.

Arminius confirms the fragility of Arminian salvation. He says that the believer can grieve the Holy Spirit so that he does not “exert his power and efficacy in them,” and that “if David had died in the very  moment in which he had sinned against Uriah by adultery and murder, he would have been condemned to death eternal.”[13] Arminius also explicitly says that fear keeps us in Christ rather than the grace of the Holy Spirit or our love for God.

The persuasion by which any believer assuredly persuades himself that it is impossible for him to decline from the faith, or that, at least, he will not decline from the faith, does not conduce so much to consolation against despair or against the doubting that is adverse to faith and hope, as it contributes to security, a thing directly opposed to that most salutary fear with which we are commanded to work out our salvation.[14]

Assurance of salvation does not keep us from falling away. Instead it provides security, and security opposes the fear that Arminius believes motivates us to work out our salvation. God forbid we believe our salvation is secure. Arminius continues by saying that this fear “inspires consolation and excludes anxiety.”[15] Fear prevents fear.

Paul does indeed tell believers to “work out [their] salvation with fear and trembling,” (Philippians 2.12) but this is not a fear of eternal punishment. Indeed, Paul immediately tells the Philippians that God works in us. We work out our salvation while he works within us, and the true work does not depend on us but on God. We know that there is no condemnation for us (Romans 8.1, 34) and that nothing separates us from his love (Romans 8.35-39). Paul exhorted the Philippians to fear the magnificence of Christ, highly exalted by God (2.9), at whose name every knee will eventually bow, and every tongue confess that he is Lord (2.11). Paul wanted the Philippians not to fear eternal damnation, but Christ himself. We fear Christ and we love him not because he will condemn us, but because he is God and he died for us.
We love, because he first loved us.[16]
Jerry Walls and Joseph Dongell believe that believers can lose their salvation. They say, “An initial response of faith and obedience doe not guarantee one’s final salvation. It is possible to begin a genuine relationship with God but then later turn from him and persist in evil so that one is finally lost.”[17] Obviously Finney believes that a Christian can fall from grace. Explaining what he does not believe about perseverance, he says
It is not intended that saints, or the truly regenerate, cannot fall from grace, and be finally lost, by natural possibility. Saints on earth and in heaven can by natural possibility apostatize and fall, and be lost. Were not this naturally possible, there would be no virtue in perseverance.[18]
Finally, we see the ultimate motivation for Arminian theology. We know that will provides the cornerstone, but what drives the Arminian? What provides the determination, the perseverance, or the strength of the Arminian believer? He wants to be virtuous. Though Finney admits to some reliance on the grace of God to meet his conditions for perpetual justification, as he otherwise refers to it, he refuses to believe that God guarantees his salvation, for that would exclude “virtue.” There must be the possibility of failure for there to be the possibility of virtue. There is no scripture he can use to support this position. God does not praise virtue on its own merit, but only as it proceeds from his grace and his Spirit to glorify him. Paul says that God works in us (Philippians 2.12-13), and that he provides our work and we walk in it (Ephesians 2.10). God grants repentance (Acts 5.31; 11.18; 2 Timothy 2.25). Christ says that apart from him, we are nothing (John 15.5). With God, we repent and we work out our salvation, and without him, we are nothing. In everything, God is glorified.
Why is the desire to be virtuous such a problem? Read this again:
Saints on earth and in heaven can by natural possibility apostatize and fall, and be lost. Were not this naturally possible, there would be no virtue in perseverance.
Finney believes that saints, glorified in heaven, eternally present with Christ can lose their position and be damned to hell forever. He needs this to be a possibility to uphold his notion of virtue. This demonstrates pride of the most ignominious and blasphemous degree. He wants the possibility of eternal damnation so that his virtue is real. If virtue is guaranteed, then it is not true virtue. If Finney is virtuous not merely by the passive grace of God, but by his active work in Finney’s heart, then Finney is not truly virtuous. If Finney perseveres because God guarantees it, then Finney is not virtuous because he has not persevered, but God has kept him. Finney wants to be able to fail so that his success has meaning, in his perception. This is not a scriptural position but a profoundly arrogant philosophical one. The Arminian craves personal glory.

I do not blame the Arminian for this. I love glory, to win awards, to earn honor, or to defeat opponents. Personal glory is amazing. I do not blame the Arminian for being proud. No one is more proud than myself. I blame the Arminian for not admitting to this and for pretending this theology somehow brings honor to God. It does not. God is glorified when everything we are depends on him and every good work originates from him and is secured by him.
By their own sword they did not possess the land, and their own arm did not save them, but your right hand and your arm and the light of your presence, for you favored them.
Cursed is the man who trusts in mankind and makes flesh his strength, and whose heart turns away from the Lord.
I will have compassion on the house of Judah and deliver them by the Lord their God, and will not deliver them by bow, sword, battle, horses or horsemen.[19]
God is not just the provider of grace who only shores up our weaknesses. He does not sit in the background as we endure trial and temptation and cheer us on, occasionally propping us up or even carrying us in his arms. He gives us life. He is our life. He is our strength and hope and everything we need because we are nothing. We are flesh and weakness and without him we have no hope, no strength, and no love or faith of our own.

In No Wise

Scripture gives us many reasons to know our salvation is secure. To show that our salvation rests on God and not on us, Puritan minister John Owen names a minimum of three supports for the perseverance of the saints being God’s work and not ours, these including God’s character, purpose, and covenant.[20]

God tells the Israelites many times in the Old Testament that, despite their unfaithfulness, he remains faithful. Obviously not dependent on their righteousness, their relationship does not change because God does not change. Owen says, “He hath laid the shoulders of the unchangeableness of his own nature to this work: Malachi iii. 6, ‘I am the Lord, I change not: therefore ye sons of Jacob are not consumed.’”[21] God’s love for us does not change because he does not change.
Unless himself and his everlasting deity be subject and liable to alternation and change, it could not be that they should be cast off for ever and consumed.[22]
James says, “Every good thing given and every perfect gift is from above, coming down from the Father of lights, with whom there is no variation or shifting shadow” (James 1.17). God gives gifts that he does not take back (Romans 11.29). Arminians logically conclude that since God gives gifts based on our faith, any lack of faith necessitates that he remove these gifts, but since they begin with false assumptions, they arrive at false conclusions.

Speaking of Romans 11.29 (“The gifts and the calling of God are irrevocable”), Owen continues, “The words are added by the apostle to give assurance of the certain accomplishment of the purpose of God towards the remnant of the Jews according to the election of grace.”[23] Sanctification and justification are the gifts Paul refers to, and we keep these gifts “from the unchangeableness of the love of election, wherewith the Lord embraced them from eternity.”[24]
God gives not his gifts to men because they please him, but because it pleaseth him to do so, Jeremiah xxxi. 31, 32; he does not take them away because they displease him, but gives them so to abide with them that they shall never displease him to the height of such a provocation.[25]
The believer will sin, and by his sin will prove himself unfaithful and unworthy of election, justification, sanctification, etc., but God does not choose us because we have proven ourselves worthy, but because he seeks to glorify himself. God has chosen us so that he is glorified (Romans 9.23), and his purpose will not change.
[Israel] rebelled against me; they did not walk in my statutes, nor were they careful to observe my ordinances...so I resolved to pour out my wrath on them, to accomplish my anger against them in the wilderness. But I withdrew my hand and acted for the sake of my name, that it should not be profaned in the sight of the nations.[26]
God chose us so that he is glorified as we conform to the image of Christ; that Christ be “the firstborn among many brethren”; that we are predestined, called, justified, and glorified (Romans 8.28-30). Owen says, “God hath purposed the continuance of his love to his saints, to bring them infallibly to himself, and this purpose of God, in particular, is unchangeable.”[27] God will not change his purpose because he does not change, and neither can any other person, force, or circumstance compel him to change.
Remember this, and be assured;
Recall it to mind, you transgressors.
Remember the former things long past,
For I am God, and there is no other;
I am God, and there is no one like Me,
Declaring the end from the beginning,
And from ancient times things which have not been done,
Saying, ‘My purpose will be established,
And I will accomplish all My good pleasure.’[28]

The Arminian does not believe that God is omnipotent because they do not believe he is sovereign. They either believe God cannot override the will of men or he chooses not to. Either way, man is sovereign over God and he establishes his purposes, not God. That salvation is not secure is a necessary conclusion to their theology. Every day we fail to trust God as we ought, so why wouldn’t our salvation fail? Our purpose changes from day to day. We set out to complete a task, but we lack strength, or we remember something else that is more important, or some obstacle blocks our way.  None of these can apply to God.
The counsel and purposes of the Lord are set in opposition to the counsel and purposes of men, as to alteration, change, and frustration. ... This antithesis between the counsels of men and the purposes of God upon the account of unchangeableness is again confirmed, Prov. xix. 21, “There are many devices in a man’s heart; nevertheless the counsel of the Lord, that shall stand.”[29]
His power, wisdom, knowledge, the perfection of his character—all of these demand the unchangeableness of his purpose, including his love for us.[30]
As neither his character nor his purpose change, so neither does his covenant. God tells Abraham that he will establish an “everlasting covenant” with Abraham and his descendants, and Owen explains:
The effectual dispensation of the grace of the covenant is peculiar to them only who are the children of the promise, the remnant of Abraham according to election.[31]
Paul explains that God promised spiritual blessing to Abraham through the covenant (Galatians 3.6-9; compare Genesis 12.3). What is this spiritual blessing?
All the blessings that from God are conveyed in and by his seed, Jesus Christ. … If perseverance, if the continuance of the love and favour of God towards us, be a spiritual blessing, both Abraham and all his seed, all faithful ones throughout the world, are blessed with it in Jesus Christ.[32]
Sin separates us from God in two ways, Owen says. Sin separates us by its guilt, as God should cast off the sinner upon the account of justice. Sin also separates us by its power and deceitfulness, as we yield to temptation and “depart from God, until, as backsliders in heart, [we] are filled with our own ways.”[33] But if God removes these two, “there is no possible case imaginable of separation between God and man once brought together in peace and unity.”[34] For the first, God has removed our guilt in Christ, for he says to Jeremiah, “I will forgive their iniquity, and their sin I will remember no more” (Jeremiah 31.34). For the second, he removes the possibility of us falling away by our own devices, as he says, “I will put my law within them and on their heart I will write it” (Jeremiah 31.33). We see also in the New Testament ample evidence for Owen’s claims.
All that the Father gives me will come to me, and the one who comes to me I will certainly not cast out.
I give eternal life to them, and they will never perish; and no one will snatch them out of my hand.
Who will separate us from the love of Christ? Will tribulation, or distress, or persecution, or famine, or nakedness, or peril, or sword? … But in all these things we overwhelmingly conquer through Him who loved us. For I am convinced that neither death, nor life, nor angels, nor principalities, nor things present, nor things to come, nor powers, nor height, nor depth, nor any other created thing, will be able to separate us from the love of God, which is in Christ Jesus our Lord.
But Jesus, on the other hand, because He continues forever, holds His priesthood permanently. Therefore He is able also to save forever those who draw near to God through Him, since He always lives to make intercession for them.[35]
Our salvation does not depend on our works or our continued faithfulness, but only on God.

Falling Away

Arminians take great pains to prove that we lose our salvation. Walls and Dongell confuse believers with unbelievers.[36] Wesley adds lengthy assumptions to the definition of “grieving the Holy Spirit.” Both Wesley and Finney remove the imputation of Christ’s righteousness to believers and maintain that we must earn our own righteousness in order to be accepted by God. Though the Arminian case for a fragile salvation proves no less fragile than the salvation itself, they do have many verses that seem to indicate that the believer can perish eternally.
So then, brethren, we are under obligation, not to the flesh, to live according to the flesh—for if you are living according to the flesh, you must die.[37]
Though Paul addresses this to the entire church at Rome, he clarifies who “we” and “us” refers to at the beginning of the chapter:
He condemned sin in the flesh, so that the requirement of the Law might be fulfilled in us, who do not walk according to the flesh but according to the Spirit. For those who are according to the flesh set their minds on the things of the flesh, but those who are according to the Spirit, the things of the Spirit. For the mind set on the flesh is death, but the mind set on the Spirit is life and peace, because the mind set on the flesh is hostile toward God; for it does not subject itself to the law of God, for it is not even able to do so, and those who are in the flesh cannot please God.[38]
The believer does not walk according to the flesh. His mind is set on the Spirit and not the flesh because those whose mind is set on the flesh cannot please God. This describes the notion of all the verses that seem to teach that the believer can fall away. These passages do not in fact describe the believer, but the unbeliever. They describe someone who may even have some experience in the Church, and some knowledge of the Word of God, but they do not believe in Christ and have not received his Spirit.
Quite right, they were broken off for their unbelief, but you stand by your faith. Do not be conceited, but fear; for if God did not spare the natural branches, He will not spare you, either. Behold then the kindness and severity of God; to those who fell, severity, but to you, God’s kindness, if you continue in His kindness; otherwise you also will be cut off.[39]
“You stand by your faith,” Paul says. Again, the Arminian maintains that faith does not originate from God but from men, and since men change from day to day, faith changes from day to day. One day faith lives, and the next, it dies. Faith does not originate from men, however. God gives faith.[40] Yes, if the “believer” does not continue in his faith, God will not spare him, but the believer will. Only the false believer will fail to believe. Paul also says
Who are you to judge the servant of another? To his own master he stands or falls; and he will stand, for the Lord is able to make him stand.[41]
Every similar verse makes the same point—if you do not continue in faith, you will perish.[42] Calvinists do not deny this, but they believe that God grants the believer faith and strength to continue. The Arminian must also ignore or pervert John’s words:
They went out from us, but they were not really of us; for if they had been of us, they would have remained with us; but they went out, so that it would be shown that they all are not of us.[43]
Owen asks
Doth not the main weight of the doctrine turn on this hinge, that God hath promised to his saints, true believers, such supplies of the Spirit and grace as that they shall never degenerate into such loose and profane courses as are destructive to godliness?[44]
Christ explains the situation in the parable of the sower (Matthew 13.1-23). He describes four types of soil, and in only one does his word bear fruit. In the rest, there may be some indication of faith, but no fruit which proves it. In the same chapter, Christ tells the parable of the wheat and the tares. Both true and false believers blend together, and only at the end can we tell the difference (13.24-30). In verse 10-17, Christ explains the situation without a parable—God has opened the eyes of those that belong to him, and the rest remain blind.

God chose us because we could not have chosen him. He justified us completely. He grants us grace and faith to persevere in holiness. The Arminian does not believe in the grace and power of the Holy Spirit to overcome our sinful nature, and therefore he must use fear to motivate us to holiness. He believes in the will of men above the will and power of God and to his will he consistently worships.


[1] Walls and Dongell, 67, 74. Walls and Dongell believe that though God pursues us with tender, almighty, wooing love, he immediately abandons his pursuit at our slightest resistance.
[2] John Wesley, “On Grieving the Holy Spirit,” introductory remarks.
[3] Ibid, I.3.
[4] Wesley, “Christian Perfection,” II.3., “On Sin in Believers,” II.2-3., “Salvation by Faith,” II.6.
[5] Wesley, “Grieving,” I.2., “First Fruits of the Spirit,” II.4.
[6] Ibid, I.2-3.
[7] Ibid, I.3.
[8] Jeremiah 31.20
[9] Jeremiah 31.35-37.
[10] Wesley, “First Fruits,” II.3.
[11] Wesley, “Grieving,” II.
[12] Finney, 369.
[13] Arminius, 502.
[14] Ibid, 503.
[15] Ibid.
[16] 1 John 4.19.
[17] Walls and Dongell, 11.
[18] Finney, 508.
[19] Psalm 44.3; Jeremiah 17.9; Hosea 1.7.
[20] John Owen, The Works of John Owen: Volume 11: Continuing in the Faith, (Carlisle: Banner of Truth Trust, 1850), page 120. Owen names five, though he only explains four, intending to defer the last. I have only included the first three here, as the fourth, God’s promises, seems to overlap the first two. Owen manages to add two other supports, namely, the intercession of Christ and the indwelling of the Spirit.
[21] Ibid.
[22] Ibid, 121.
[23] Ibid, 122.
[24] Ibid.
[25] Ibid, 126.
[26] Ezekiel 20.21-22.
[27] Owen, Continuing, 143.
[28] Isaiah 46.8-11
[29] Owen, Continuing, 146.
[30] Ibid, 144-149.
[31] Ibid, 206.
[32] Ibid.
[33] Ibid, 209.
[34] Ibid.
[35] John 6.37; 10.28; Romans 8.35,37-39; Hebrews 7.24-25. I introduce a fourth proof in this last verse, the intercession of Christ, but there is at least one more, the Holy Spirit within us, referred to as the “pledge (i.e., promise) of our inheritance” (Ephesians 1.14).
[36] Walls and Dongell, 80-81.
[37] Romans 8.12-13.
[38] Romans 8.3-8
[39] Romans 11.20-22.
[40] See “Regeneration.”
[41] Romans 14.4
[42] Galatians 5.21; Hebrews 6.4-6; 10.26-27.
[43] 1 John 2.19.
[44] Owen, Continuing, 409.

Goat Farmers: Introduction

  Introduction I am not ashamed of the Gospel. [1] The late Christian apologist Ravi Zacharias explains the motivation that led him to write...